Wednesday 31 March 2010

9th Annual FUUS



Solving Clinical Challenges,
Improving Patient Care

Through compelling lectures, lively debate,
complex cases, panel discussions, and
surgical video, distinguished faculty will
present cutting-edge information on the
diagnosis, management, and treatment
of lower urinary tract symptoms and
pelvic floor disorders.

20 CME Credits Available


Exhibit & Sponsor Information



Mediwatch USA
1501 Northpoint Parkway, Suite 103
West Palm Beach, FL 33407
T: 888-471-2611
F: 866-871-8262
URL: www.Mediwatch.com

Mediwatch are manufacturers and suppliers of high-technology pelvic floor diagnosis products. We focus on innovation in point-of-care devices, enabling clinicians to make rapid and efficient decisions. We provide urodynamics, anorectal manometry & ultrasounds systems with full range of disposables and dedicated teams for service and clinical training and support.

9th Annual Female Urology and Urogynecology Symposium

Thursday 25 March 2010

Mediwatch Training Courses

Tomorrow sees the second training course relating to 'Anorectal Manometry & Pudendal Nerve Terminal Motor Latency Testing',the first being last December at St Margaret’s Women’s Health Center,Boston Massachusetts with the same venue this time.

Training Link

Previous posts on the subject matter:

Anorectal manometry

Pudendal Nerve

EDIT:

Also worth highlighting this again:

Mediwatch Service & Sales Support Program (USA)

Sunday 14 March 2010

Education - Basic Urodynamics

I'm assuming this is the event that Mediwatch are attending and quite probably taking part in a teaching capacity:

"Basic Urodynamics Course 16-17 March Bristol"

Basic Urodynamics

Main Course Venue:
The Clifton Pavilion, (Bristol Zoo Gardens), Clifton, Bristol, BS8 3HA.
Click here to view venue

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Course Overview:
This course is designed for those who are interested but not already experienced in the subject, the main part of the course being held on Tuesday 16th & Wednesday 17th March 2010.

There will be an optional practical day on Monday 15th March 2010. This day is intended for nurses and technicians with LITTLE or NO URODYNAMIC EXPERIENCE who wish to have an introducation to the practical aspect of urodynamics. Doctors who are particularly interested in practical aspects of urodynamics may join the practical day. Attendance is limited to 24 participants.

The main course on the Tuesday and Wednesday will cover: Anatomy and Physiology, Basic techniques, Urodynamics Equipment, Clinical Applications and Management in Urology, Gynaecology and Spinal Injuries. Numbers are limited to 50.

There will be concurrent exhibition of available urodynamic equipment.

Numbers will be limited to 50 participants for the Main Course on Tuesday and Wednesday.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


REGISTRATION NOW CLOSED

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Practical Day Topics Include:

Equipment and Measurement
Demonstration of Urodynamic Technique
Video Transmission of
Female Urodynamic Test
Male Urodynamic Test
Demonstration of Video Urodynamic Recordings
Setting up Equipment (Practical)
Interpretation of Traces
Group Work - practical problems


Main Course Topics Include:

Principles of Urodynamics
Uroflowmetry
Filling Cystometry
Urethral Pressure Profilometry
Long Term Ambulatory Monitoring
Voiding Cystometry
Video Urodynamics
The Significance of Urinary Symptoms
Urodynamics in Children
Urodynamics in Women
Urodynamics in Men
Urodynamics in Neuropathic Patients
Setting up a Urodynamic Clinic

Bristol Urological Institute

Friday 12 March 2010

PSA Test Reduces Prostate Cancer Deaths By 40%

When it comes to the documented 40 percent effectiveness of PSA testing in preventing death from prostate cancer, neither the American Cancer Society nor the discoverer of the PSA protein, Richard Ablin, are telling the public the complete story.

"The American Cancer Society is a 'false prophet' when it comes to telling the truth about the effectiveness of the PSA test," said ZERO's CEO Skip Lockwood. "Dr. Otis Brawley disregards scientific data about the value of the PSA test in saving lives. In fact, his views at a recent medical conference were vigorously challenged by physicians and researchers in attendance."

"Dr. Brawley seems more concerned about sex than saving lives. He's obsessed with the side effects of treatment rather than a solution for saving lives. He wants you to trust him instead of the 30,000 urologists in the U.S. and gamble you're not among the thousands of men who die each year with aggressive prostate cancer tumors," said Lockwood.

Lockwood acknowledges that the PSA test, like the mammogram, is not perfect.

"No one disputes that the PSA test cannot distinguish slow-growing tumors from rapidly growing ones, yet no one disputes that the PSA test is still the best tool available for early diagnosis and prompt treatment for prostate cancer.

"The long-term solution is to discover a new biomarker for prostate cancer without false positives or negatives and one that determines who has a life-threatening disease and who doesn't.

One of the nation's leading experts on prostate cancer, Dr. William J. Catalona of Northwestern University, commented, "Although the PSA test is not perfect, it is effective in identifying men at high risk for prostate cancer and for detecting it early."

The PSA test, the most prevalent method in use today for prostate cancer, has saved thousands of lives. The PSA test and advances in treatment have led to a 40 percent reduction in prostate cancer deaths since the mid-1990s, according to the National Cancer Institute. Because of the PSA test, 90 percent of all prostate cancers are now discovered before they spread outside the gland, according to the American Cancer Society's own data.

Dr. Patrick C. Walsh, distinguished professor of urology at Johns Hopkins University noted, "Because prostate cancer produces no symptoms until it's too far advanced to cure, as appropriate, men should have a PSA test and examination. Until an alternative exists, prostate cancer testing is the best option we have to allow men to make an informed decision."

Despite misleading claims by the ACS, the value of early detection through PSA testing is supported by more than a dozen leading U.S. organizations.

These include the American Urological Association, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Prostate Cancer Foundation, Prostate Cancer Research Institute, Malecare Prostate Cancer Support, Men's Health Network, National Alliance of State Prostate Cancer Coalitions, Prostate Cancer International, Prostate Conditions Education Council, Prostate Health Education Network, The Prostate Net, Us TOO International Prostate Cancer Education and Support Network, and Women Against Prostate Cancer.

This is not the first time that the ACS has been sharply challenged. Claims that their views are based on "scientific evidence" were disputed as recently as late last year (and more recently, at the 2010 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium held last week).

ACS became embroiled in a firestorm of controversy last October by seeking to change its guidelines that women did not need an annual mammogram until age 50, instead of 40. ACS quickly backed off after an outcry from the public and health and government officials.

"The only difference between the PSA test and mammograms is there aren't millions of men who will stand up to the claims being peddled by Brawley and the American Cancer Society," Lockwood said.

Contrary to ACS claims, medical data suggest mammograms and PSA testing are effective. Based on data by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), mammography screening has led to a 15 percent reduction in breast cancer deaths. USPSTF also references an ongoing screening study where early detection (using the PSA test) has so far reduced prostate cancer deaths by 20 percent.

"This concerted agenda by ACS and Mr. Ablin, both in their timing and their message, purposely fails to disclose all of the facts about PSA testing. Mr. Ablin in particular should be pleased that his discovery of PSA has led to a 40 percent reduction in prostate cancer deaths."

Similarities between breast and prostate cancer data in the U.S. are striking. Each is the most frequently diagnosed noncutaneous cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death for their respective gender. In 2009, new cases of each cancer were at about 194,000. One in six men is struck with prostate cancer annually; for breast cancer, it's one in eight women.

Source: The Project to End Prostate Cancer

PSA Test Reduces Prostate Cancer Deaths By 40%

Tuesday 9 March 2010

March-Music,Film and the odd joke spot.






Have to find Rock Lobster now...............for some reason!

Forgot about this live version........awesome! :-)

The forgotten cancer: Bladder cancer and women




Hopefully Urotoday won't mind me copying this over here..............put their advert above :-)



AUA Responds To American Cancer Society Guideline For The Early Detection Of Prostate Cancer

American Cancer Society issued its new Guideline for the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer. The American Urological Association (AUA), which represents more than 16,000 urologists and urologic health professionals worldwide, issued the following statement in response to the new ACS document. The statement is attributable to AUA President Anton J. Bueschen, MD.

"The American Urological Association (AUA) today applauds the American Cancer Society (ACS) for its new guidance statement on prostate cancer detection. We concur that informed consent - including a discussion between physician and patient about the risks and benefits of testing - is a key part of one's decision to be tested for prostate cancer. It is equally necessary that patients receive reliable information from culturally appropriate sources.

However, the new ACS statement may not fully characterize the potential benefits of an individualized approach to assessing risk in men considering the risk and benefits of early detection strategies and may cause significant confusion for patients. The AUA feels there is no single PSA standard that applies to all men, nor should there be. Part of informed consent is giving patients as much information about their personal risk as is available. Applying population-based cut points while ignoring other individual risk factors (such as age, ethnicity, family history, previous biopsy characteristics, etc.) may not give a patient the most optimal assessment of his risk, including the risk of high grade disease.

Prostate cancer testing is an individual decision that patients should make together with their doctor. The AUA believes that all men, with a life expectancy of 10 years or more, should have a baseline PSA test at the age of 40. Physicians should determine rescreening intervals for each patient based on PSA (and, on occasion on its change over time). Likewise, the decision to proceed to prostate biopsy should be based not only on elevated PSA and/or abnormal DRE results, but should take into account multiple factors including free and total PSA, patient age, PSA velocity, PSA density, family history, ethnicity, prior biopsy history and comorbidities. Although prostate cancer risk correlates with serum PSA, there is no PSA value below which a man may be reassured that he does not have biopsy detectable prostate cancer.

The AUA is in full agreement with the ACS that current early detection strategies need to be refined and better validated. It is hoped that new biomarkers will be identified which better distinguish between indolent and aggressive prostate cancer, sparing the former from unnecessary testing and giving the latter a better chance of survival.

In April 2009, the AUA issued its new Best Practice Statement on Prostate-Specific Antigen, which can be viewed here."

Source
American Urological Association

AUA Responds To American Cancer Society Guideline For The Early Detection Of Prostate Cancer

PSA Remains An Important Tool For Fighting Cancer Says Prostate Cancer Foundation

Responding to continued debate over PSA screening, and today's American Cancer Society statement, the Prostate Cancer Foundation (PCF) reiterated its position that PSA screening remains a valuable tool, in combination with other tools, for identifying potential prostate disease, including cancer. It is also calling for more reasoned discussion that empowers patients and their physicians and improves patients' understanding of PSA data, prostate cancer and treatment options.

"Every man has the right to know if he has cancer and to make informed decisions with his urologist. This requires a thorough dialog between patients, family members and urologists that weighs the pros and cons of screening and treatment options," says Jonathan W. Simons, president and CEO of PCF. "While medical specialists know that the current PSA test is imperfect, it can be an important tool for diagnosing various problems with the prostate and taking care of men's health."

Last year more than 27,000 American men died of prostate cancer-one every 19 minutes-and more than 192,000 new cases were diagnosed. There is also good news. With advances in awareness, new treatments and earlier detection and treatment, the death rate for prostate cancer has dropped by 40 percent of what was once projected.

Controversy has risen over screening for the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) because it is not cancer-specific. Further, once cancer is diagnosed, it is still very difficult in some patients to differentiate between the indolent (slow-growing) and very aggressive, potentially lethal, varieties of prostate cancer. As a result, overtreatment of some patients does occur. PCF supports the guidelines laid out by the American Urological Association that call for a baseline PSA screening at 40 years old and then a follow up strategy developed by the physician and patient, based upon the patient's specific health status and family history. (See AUA Guidelines below.) If cancer is found, risk factors including family and patient histories, a physical exam, Gleason scores, PSA velocity, and personal preferences should all be considered when developing an individualized treatment plan that is best suited for the patient.

"Unfortunately, public debate has focused mostly on the limitations of the PSA blood test rather than improving processes for informing patients. We should not throw this proverbial baby out with the bath water," explains Simons. "PCF-funded researchers are making crucial progress in identifying new biomarkers that could one day make the PSA test obsolete. Until new diagnostics are available, we need to guard against telling patients not to be screened. Discussions of early detection of prostate cancers, when they are best treated, are imperative."

The debate also underscores the unmet and urgent need for more research directed toward developing better, more prostate cancer-specific biomarkers and diagnostic tests. As the nation looks to reform healthcare, an important strategy for attaining real cost savings is increased investment in research so healthcare providers can cure patients earlier and over treat less. Prostate cancer, by incidence, is to men what breast cancer is to women, but federal funding of research for this disease is approximately 40 percent lower. With many American families burdened by both prostate and breast cancers, many prostate cancer organizations are working to increase investment and achieve the same crucial success in funding as the breast cancer community.

PCF experts have calculated that having the ability to distinguish between lethal and non-lethal or indolent varieties of prostate cancer might have saved an estimated $30 billion dollars between 1986 and 2005. With the tools to identify which patients had aggressive prostate cancer, overtreatment could have been avoided and more lives would have been saved by directing intensive care to those who needed it most.

Tomorrow, actor Louis Gossett, Jr. will testify about his recent prostate cancer diagnosis before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. The hearing will explore prostate cancer screening, research and treatment matters. PCF-funded researcher, Theodore L. DeWeese, M.D., Professor of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Urology and Oncology, Chairman and Radiation Oncologist-in-Chief of the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital, will also provide testimony. Otis Brawley from the American Cancer Society is also scheduled to testify.

AUA PSA Guidelines

The American Urological Association (AUA) and the AUA Foundation believe that early detection of and risk assessment for prostate cancer should be offered to asymptomatic men 40 years of age or older who have a life expectancy of at least 10 years. Men who wish to be screened should have both a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test and a digital rectal exam (DRE). The decision to proceed to prostate biopsy should be based not only on PSA and DRE results, but should take into account multiple factors including free and total PSA, patient age, PSA velocity, PSA density, family history, ethnicity, prior biopsy history and co-morbidities. The AUA strongly supports informed consent before screening is undertaken and the option of active surveillance, in lieu of immediate treatment, for certain men found to have prostate cancer.

Source
Prostate Cancer Foundation

PSA Remains An Important Tool For Fighting Cancer Says Prostate Cancer Foundation

NEWS-Week Ending 14th March

Wednesday 3 March 2010

ACS issues new prostate cancer screening guidelines

Looks like the USA are taking a step back and involving shared decision making between clinicians and patients for starters which has to be a good thing.

The updated guidelines include these recommendations:

•Asymptomatic men who have at least a ten-year life expectancy should have an opportunity to make an informed decision with their health care provider about screening for prostate cancer after receiving information about the uncertainties, risks, and potential benefits associated with screening.

•Men at average risk should receive this information beginning at age 50.

•Men at higher risk, including African American men and men with a first degree relative (father or brother) diagnosed with prostate cancer before age 65, should receive this information beginning at age 45.

•Men at appreciably higher risk (multiple family members diagnosed with prostate cancer before age 65) should receive this information beginning at age 40.

•Men should either receive this information directly from their health care providers or be referred to reliable and culturally appropriate sources.

•Patient decision aids are helpful in preparing men to make a decision whether to be tested.

•Prostate cancer screening should not occur without an informed decision making process.

•Asymptomatic men who have less than a ten-year life expectancy based on age and health status should not be offered prostate cancer screening.

•For men who are unable to decide, the screening decision can be left to the discretion of the health care provider, who should factor into the decision his or her knowledge of the patient’s general health preferences and values

The "New" Prostate Cancer InfoLink article/viewpoint

American Cancer Society Article

Tuesday 2 March 2010

Men in the dark about simple test that plays key role in prostate cancer diagnosis

Seven out of ten men who are at an increased risk of prostate cancer are not aware of a simple blood test which can give an early indication of the disease which kills one man every hour in the UK, new research has revealed.

The inequities surrounding men’s knowledge and access to the PSA blood test were also highlighted through the research, which was commissioned by The Prostate Cancer Charity* to time with the launch of its annual awareness month, in March. Worryingly, men over 50 - the age at which the likelihood of developing the disease increases - from less affluent backgrounds are much more likely to be in the dark about the test. The probability of these men requesting a PSA test is three times lower than those from higher socio-economic groups.

The usefulness of the PSA test - the cornerstone of prostate cancer diagnosis - has been the subject of intense medical debate for many years. Experts struggle to find a consensus on the balance of risks of widespread use of the PSA test leading to over diagnosis and over treatment of slow growing forms of the disease and the benefits of detecting the cancer early for men with an aggressive cancer.

Because of this complex balance between the advantages and disadvantages of the PSA test, GP’s have been given clear guidance by Government on how to counsel men who request a test, but have no symptoms of the disease - the Prostate Cancer Risk Management Programme.

Yet, the stark fact remains that one in five men surveyed who do request the test, the best method currently available to indicate a problem with the prostate, say they have been turned down by their GP.

John Neate, Chief Executive of The Prostate Cancer Charity, explains: “This research is of real significance as it shows a critical gap in awareness of the PSA test, as well as offering an important clue in understanding what men considering the test actually know about it.

“Interest in the usefulness of the PSA test as a screening tool has grown considerably over the past year. Although it is far from perfect, the test is the first step along the road to diagnosing prostate cancer. For many men, undergoing a PSA test could expose a slow growing cancer which may never cause them a problem - even without treatment. At the same time, for men with an aggressive cancer, who have no symptoms of the disease, the test may be the only way the disease will be identified at a time when effective treatment can be offered. The decision on whether to have the PSA test must therefore be made by men themselves - based on unbiased advice about its pros and cons.

“Our survey highlights the critical role GPs must play in providing balanced information to men about the PSA test. It is completely unacceptable that so many men at risk of prostate cancer are unaware of their right to request a PSA test, We must move swiftly to a position of ‘universal informed choice’ where all men are made aware of their right to request a test and to be given clear information about its usefulness and limitations so they can decide whether having the test is right for them. We are working intensively on proposals for how this can best be achieved and plan to make these public over the coming months.”

This year, The Prostate Cancer Charity is using Prostate Cancer Awareness Month to expose the fact that the disease is the ‘hidden cancer’ and to cast light on all of the unseen aspects of the disease - from the fact that it can be a taboo topic, to the hidden and often unmet support and information needs of men living with the disease.

Anyone wanting more information can visit http://www.hiddencancer.org.uk


Men in the dark about simple test that plays key role in prostate cancer diagnosis

NEWS-Week Ending 7th March

The Prostate Cancer Charity pays tribute to Winston Churchill UK-2nd March 2010

UK-Prostate Cancer Awareness Month

March is Prostate Cancer Awareness Month in the UK


What's it all About?

What is the prostate cancer awareness month all about?We want men, the general public, and health professionals, to be more aware of prostate cancer. Our awareness month helps raise vital funds for much needed support and information for men who have been diagnosed and their families. It also allows us to lobby the UK's key decision makers because it is high time that the issue of prostate cancer is brought out into the open.
Prostate Cancer Awareness Month



Mark Foster Strikes A Revealing Pose To Help Expose The ‘Hidden Cancer’

Fans of BBC1’s Strictly Come Dancing still in a flutter about Mark Foster’s famous physique, will have another chance to see his celebrated ‘pecs’ as he takes his clothes off again – this time for a very good cause.

Olympic swimmer, Foster, will front this year’s Prostate Cancer Awareness Month in March, as Marks & Spencer joins forces with The Prostate Cancer Charity to help highlight that the disease is still the ‘hidden cancer’.



Hidden Cancer Case Studies
Over the past year, twelve couples have been interviewed about the reality of living with prostate cancer and how this affects their lives. They talk about the hidden aspects of this disease and the way that it affects their everyday lives and their relationships. You can share their experiences by visiting www.prostatecouples.com
Hidden Cancer Case Studies
Here is the link to prostatecouples.com


Men across London are urged to give prostate cancer the red card

The World Cup 2010 is just around the corner, and whilst football fans all over the country are crossing their fingers for a 1966 result, men across London will be locked in a battle of their own - The Prostate Cancer Charity’s Real Man Cup.

The Charity’s annual men’s five-a-side tournament is back and this year’s event, which is scheduled for Saturday 13 March, is promising to be bigger than ever. Men across the capital are invited to live out their childhood dreams and score a goal at Wembley - at the Soccer Goals Centre that is, to help give prostate cancer the red card during Prostate Cancer Awareness Month.
Men across London are urged to give prostate cancer the red card

Monday 1 March 2010

NHS-Purchasing & Supply Agency 2009-PSA Assays

Evidence review- Point of care total PSA assays February 2010

Evaluation report-Total PSA assays February 2010


I've only just seen these reports and it would appear,as expected, that PSAwatch may be used for initial testing only.......as far as the UK is concerned anyway!

My view from reading both the review and report is that the Mediwatch PSAwatch/Bioscan system offers an accurate method of gaining PSA values for initial testing purposes but not as accurate as the lab based tests which the NHS states as their preferred method.

Overall I'm happy with the findings and very happy to see Mediwatch as a leader in the POC PSA Assay sector.I believe the Mediwatch PSAwatch/Bioscan system will generate great interest on a global scale,especially for initial testing with a very easy to use and portable system and hence Inverness Medical's interest.

NHS-Purchasing & Supply Agency 2009 Urody.Systems

Buyers' guide-Urodynamic systems December 2009

Evaluation report-Urodynamic systems December 2009

FUTURE EVENTS AND LATEST NEWS

Latest News



Mediwatch Training Courses

Fundamentals of Urodynamics (18-19th March 2010 at Lutheran General Hospital Illinois Urogynecology,LTD)


Anorectal Manometry & Pudendal Nerve Terminal Motor Latency Testing (26th March 2010 at St Margaret’s Women’s Health Center,Boston MA.)




Future Events

Southeastern Section of the AUA,Inc.-74th Annual Meeting (March 11–14 Miami Beach,FL)



SUNA's 2010 Annual Symposium (March 11-13 ~Colorado Springs,CO)



10th Annual Female Pelvic Floor Disorders (March 12-15 Fort Lauderdale, FL)







STUFF THAT MAYBE DID BUT NOW
DOESN'T FIT IN WITH THE TITLE...



December/January Mediwatch Newsletter

Mediwatch Interim Results for the six month ended 30 April 2009

Five year global distribution agreement secured with Inverness Medical Innovations-16 March 2009

Preliminary Results for the year ended 31 October 2008-Issued 26 January 2009